Homepage › Forums › Clinical Questions › In & Out vs Marinating…?
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 7 months ago by
John.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 8, 2016 at 7:07 pm #1424
John
ParticipantSue,
Can you please explain the rationale for letting the needles marinate for 10minutes or so vs a more in/out method? I understand why we do the in/out for the upper trap, pec and lat along w/ the joint line in the knee; however, why do we not do that for all other points?
Thanks!
LoganNovember 20, 2016 at 11:04 pm #1444Unknown was SFDN
MemberLogan!
First off, I love the name of your subject! lol!
Second, let me apologize for taking some time to get back to you. I wanted to look up a few things before I responded.The best answer I can really find is best described by Dr. Dunning in his article: DN- a lit review with clinical implications (1). Most clinical trial research we have, have left needles in for 5-40 minutes and a systematic review showed that leaving needles in the low back for 10 minutes was “better” than immediate removal.
With that said, from a clinical experience perspective, I think there are times when in and out (for safety reasons…upper trap, pec, lat/ teres) is still highly effective and I have seen huge, positive changes with that method. Theoretically, all we need to do is create a lesion to begin the physiological cascade of healing.
I do also feel (personally when I get needled, and subjectively from my athletes) that specifically when in contractile tissue (aka muscle and ligament) that people feel a “letting go” sensation as we let that needle “marinate”. I know I feel like the muscle is melting/ relaxing/ letting go when it is left for some time to fit.
So, for now based on the evidence we have, I will leave a needle sit for up to 40 minutes (but often 10 minutes simply based on scheduling) unless I have a safety concern. In those cases, I am relying on the physiological cascade being kick started by simply creating the lesion.
This would be a FANTASTIC study for any grad student or researcher out there…same diagnosis…same needle areas, different in situ times…look at outcomes. Any takers??? :-)
Hope that helps.
SueNovember 20, 2016 at 11:08 pm #1445Unknown was SFDN
MemberForgot the reference:
1. Dunning, J, Butts, R, Mourad, F, Young, I, Flannagan, S, and Perreault, T. Dry needling: a literature review with implications for clinical practice guidelines1. Phys Ther Rev 108331913X13844, 2014.
November 21, 2016 at 4:22 am #1446John
ParticipantThanks, Sue!!! I feel the same type of relaxation after a few minutes when I needle myself and get that report from my patients. I’ve just had some patients who are somewhat uncertain about the needling, and for those patients I just go in, out and done, and they seem to be comfortable with that.
Thanks again!
Logan -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

